|
KMID : 0191120090240050930
|
|
Journal of Korean Medical Science
2009 Volume.24 No. 5 p.930 ~ p.935
|
|
|
Is Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia Enough for Pain Control in Patients Who Underwent Thoracoscopy?
|
|
Kim Ji-Ae
Kim Tae-Hyeong
Yang Mi-Kyung
Gwak Mi-Sook
Kim Gaab-Soo
Kim Myung-Joo
Cho Hyun-Sung
Sim Woo-Seok
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
This prospective randomized study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of two common analgesic techniques, thoracic epidural patient-controlled analgesia (Epidural PCA), and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA), in patients undergoing lobectomy by the video-assisted thoracic surgical (VATS) approach. Fifty-two patients scheduled for VATS lobectomy were randomly allocated into two groups: an Epidural PCA group receiving an epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.2%+fentanyl 5 μg/mL combination at a rate of 4 mL/hr, and an IV PCA group receiving an intravenous infusion of ketorolac 0.2 mg/kg+fentanyl 15 μg/mL combination at a rate of 1 mL/hr. Pain scores were then recorded using the visual analogue scale at rest and during motion (VAS-R and VAS-M, 0-10) for five days following surgery. In addition, we measured the daily morphine consumption, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), satisfaction score, and the incidence of side effects. Thirty-seven patients out of 52 completed the study (18 in the Epidural PCA group, 19 in the IV PCA group). There were no differences in the pain scores, analgesic requirements, pulmonary function, satisfaction score, and the incidence of side effects between groups. This indicates that IV PCA and Epidural PCA are equally effective to control the postoperative pain after VATS lobectomy, which suggests that IV PCA may be used instead of Epidural PCA.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled, Pain Measurement, Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
 
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
    
|
|